FC3T2 I2O support installation t bug
Jarod Wilson
jcw at wilsonet.com
Wed Oct 13 05:33:08 UTC 2004
On Oct 8, 2004, at 07:19, fedora-test-list-request at redhat.com wrote:
> From: Warren Togami <wtogami at redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: FC3T2 I2O support installation t bug
>
> Michael Mansour wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I decided to try the I2O support in FC3T2, since I
>> currently run FC1 on that machine and trying to
>> upgrade to FC2 fails on that server (can't detect
>> disks from installation), and as I've just found out,
>> so does FC3T2.
>>
>> I've read the material on:
>>
>> http://i2o.shadowconnect.com/fedora.php
Likewise, and still no dice...
> AFAIK manually choosing the I2O block driver from the menu should no
> longer be needed. It sounds to me like your I2O card has some PCI ID
> that the kernel module does not know about. Can you please provide the
> lspci -v and lspci -n?
I've also got an Adaptec card for which the i2o block driver
auto-loads, but no drives are ever found, in either the RHEL4b1
installer or FC3t3 installer.
Adaptec 2100S, BIOS 1.62, 128MB cache, 4x36G drives set up as a RAID-5
array. I saw mention of a patch missing from FC3t2 to support 128MB
cache cards, which was supposedly going to make it into t3, but I
haven't followed closely what the status is on that...
# lspci -v
00:0c.0 PCI bridge: Adaptec (formerly DPT) PCI Bridge (rev 02) (prog-if
00 [Normal decode])
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64
Bus: primary=00, secondary=02, subordinate=02, sec-latency=64
Capabilities: [68] Power Management version 2
00:0c.1 I2O: Adaptec (formerly DPT) SmartRAID V Controller (rev 02)
(prog-if 01)
Subsystem: Adaptec (formerly DPT) 2000S Ultra3 Single Channel
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 16
BIST result: 00
Memory at e0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M]
Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=32K]
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
# lspci -n
00:0c.0 Class 0604: 1044:a500 (rev 02)
00:0c.1 Class 0e00: 1044:a501 (rev 02)
Interesting that lspci calls it a 2000S, its definitely a 2100S (my
memory says so, and so does the BIOS at POST)...
--
Jarod C. Wilson, RHCE
jcw at wilsonet.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20041012/6855c913/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list