No SRPMs on FC3t3 DVD

Maciej Żenczykowski maze at cela.pl
Tue Oct 19 01:59:42 UTC 2004


if x86_64 didn't fit, then why is the same thing true for x86?
and why not fit as many SRPMS as possible on the first DVD image
and stick the rest on a supplemental CD?
burning 2GB to a DVD is an aweful waste...

and why don't we do jigdo distribution?

On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Colin Charles wrote:

> On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 09:52, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> > The DVD ISO image for FC3t3 is much smaller than in prior releases. A
> > quick look told me it contains no SRPMs. Was this unintentional, or
> > maybe a signal of future packaging changes?
> 
> Intentional. x86_64 could not fit RPMS and SRPMS on the one DVD disc
> (yes, we're growing larger - FC4 can be pruning time)
> 




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list