warning to list

[Matias Féliciano]

Le dimanche 24 octobre 2004 à 20:40 -0700, Andrew Farris a écrit :
> On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:15 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > AMAZING POWERS OF OBSERVATION wrote:
> > >         Official messages from the Red Hat security team are never sent
> > >         unsolicited, are always sent from the address
> > >         secalert at redhat.com, and are digitally signed by GPG. All
> > >         official updates for Red Hat products are digitally signed and
> > >         should not be installed unless they are correctly signed and the
> > >         signature is verified..."
> > 
> > Too bad rawhide updates often *are* unsigned.
> 
> Which is chiefly why you're supposed to keep it off critical systems..

My personal computer (which run FC3 since FC3T2) is a "critical system".
Not you ?
Every one here know that rawhide can be completely buggy. It's not a
reason to tolerate security hole.

> that and the not-so-rare its-completely-borked-again occurrences.  It
> would certainly be nice to have them all come signed however.

Yes.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20041025/97d8c09c/attachment.sig>