Should Fedora rpms be signed?

[Ralph Angenendt]

nodata wrote:
> > | [angenenr at localhorst tmp]$rpm -v -K zsh-4.2.0-3.i386.rpm
> > | zsh-4.2.0-3.i386.rpm:
> > |     Header V3 DSA signature: OK, key ID 4f2a6fd2
> > |     Header SHA1 digest: OK (4bd8d06387d5c7175b60bf200fb84a229d79b7d4)
> > |     MD5 digest: OK (16cc40302ebfd42dc2bc1d7f47cd7ded)
> > |     V3 DSA signature: OK, key ID 4f2a6fd2
> >
> > Seems to be signed also.
> 
> Fedora Core test (rawhide) isn't signed.
> 
> Why?

I just downloaded that zsh-RPM from the development-Tree.

Ralph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20041026/5b615e09/attachment.sig>