[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva redhat com>
- To: "nodata" <fedora nodata co uk>
- Cc: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?
- Date: 26 Oct 2004 10:55:24 -0300
On Oct 26, 2004, "nodata" <fedora nodata co uk> wrote:
> Packages for Fedora Core test (rawhide) aren't always signed.
Packages in Fedora Core Test releases are signed. Packages in rawhide
aren't necessarily signed, since someone has to be around to sign
them, and, at the time the daily rawhide trees are composed, there
generally isn't anyone around. There's another thread going on on
this subject that has more details, if you're interested.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva {redhat com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva {lsd ic unicamp br, gnu.org}
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]