[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Should Fedora rpms be signed?



Le mardi 26 octobre 2004 Ã 08:25 -0400, William Hooper a Ãcrit :
> nodata said:
> > A recent scam involving fake updates to Fedora has highlighted the lack
> > of signed RPMs for Fedora Core.
> 
> How?  Would it make you feel better if the fake updates had installed a
> signature first?

Impossible. gpg check is done _before_ installing the package.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]