[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Missing in action...
- From: Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta gmail com>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Missing in action...
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 11:45:15 -0400
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 14:06:50 +0100, PFJ <paul all-the-johnsons co uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libgal-2.2.so.0, libsoup-2.2.so.6, libgal-a11y-2.2.so.0 are missing, so
> ev and ev-data-server can't be updated. Is this a rebuild problem or
> have they just not hit rawhide yet?
You know whats really funny...
i did yum update today and libsoup installed for me without any warnings
rpm -q evolution-data-server
evolution-data-server-0.0.98-1
rpm -q --requires evolution-data-server
libsoup >= 2.1.13
libsoup-2.2.so.6
rpm -q --whatprovides libsoup-2.2.so.6
no package provides libsoup-2.2.so.6
rpm -q libsoup
libsoup-2.2.0-1
rpm -q --provides libsoup
libsoup-2.2.so.7
libsoup = 2.2.0-1
So my question is... why did 'yum update' NOT scream at me about the
dep conflict?
Seems yum installed the new libsoup when it should not have and left
my already installed evolution-data-server with a broken dependancy
chain.
-jef
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]