[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: yum 2.1 & new metadata
- From: Pekka Pietikainen <pp ee oulu fi>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: yum 2.1 & new metadata
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 00:04:06 +0300
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 03:47:56PM -0500, Satish Balay wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 15:29:41 -0500 (CDT), Satish Balay <balay fastmail fm> wrote:
> > > developmen: ################################################## 3523/3523
> >
> > how many packages are in the development tree?
> > including noarch/i386/i686 AND src?
>
> Yeah - there are quiet a few packags - but I feel its a lot more
> datatransfer per yum invocation compared to the old model where the
> data for the same set of pacakges in rawhide is 180kB. (header.info
> file)
Yet another person confused by the new UI I think :-), we had
a lively discussion about this on #fedora-devel the other day.
The developmen: #### is metadata _parsing_, not downloading.
If the repository metadata is uptodate, only 1k (repomd.xml) gets
transferred, otherwise around 650k (for current rawhide).
--
Pekka Pietikainen
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]