[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: fc5 kernels after 1788 have excessive, kernel overhead



Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:

long running application doing enet to disk transfer sustains
2.6mbytes/sec transfer with 20% cpu busy (mostly non-kernel time).

Even that seems pretty low, I'd have thought you should be able to sustain 10-12MB/s

post-1788 kernel, it is 100% cpu (mostly kernel time) and 600kbytes/sec
sustained (an increase of over 20times in total cpu executed per byte
transferred and possibly an increase of 100times in kernel cpu executed
per byte transferred).

Just did a quick test here, a http wget of a 75MB file across a 100Mb/s full duplex link, where the file is fully cached on the source machine, I scrape 1.8MB/s and eat 75% CPU on a 3.0GHz HT P4, if I do some "intensive" monitoring with top, I can get it down to about 900KB/s

Of course we're not really proving anything here, we know that kernel1805 is built for debugging not for speed ...



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]