[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rawhide report: 20050706 changes

From: Alan Cox <alan redhat com>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
Cc: Thomas Woerner <twoerner redhat com>, fedora-test-list redhat com, arjanv redhat com
Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20050706 changes
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 14:59:37 -0400

On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 02:18:40PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> What about the bloat and slowdown because of the unnecessary spinlocks 
> and more complex scheduler code?

The locks shouldn't matter. AMD got locked operations on exclusive cache
lines right. Its generally only Intel boxes that had high lock costs. Not 
sure on the scheduler.

Alan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: rawhide report: 20050706 changes
  - From: Dave Jones

References:
- rawhide report: 20050706 changes
  - From: Build System
- Re: rawhide report: 20050706 changes
  - From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: rawhide report: 20050706 changes
  - From: Thomas Woerner
- Re: rawhide report: 20050706 changes
  - From: Dave Jones
- Re: rawhide report: 20050706 changes
  - From: Brian Gerst

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]