Fwd: Octave?
seth vidal
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Fri Mar 18 20:55:03 UTC 2005
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 15:09 -0500, Chuck R. Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:06:15PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> >
> > > Historically packages in extras have not been as well maintained...
> >
> > I'd love to see some proof of that. ANY proof of that, please.
>
> Not to mention that Extras hasn't existed long enough for there to
> really be a history...
If you look at the maintenance of packages in Fedora Extras 3 you should
see a good history there. Not only of active packagers but also of
recent builds of things.
so if you go only by the available history, I think things look pretty
damned good.
-sv
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list