[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fwd: Fedora Foundation]
- From: "Chasecreek Systemhouse" <chasecreek systemhouse gmail com>
- To: sundaram fedoraproject org, "For testers of Fedora Core development releases" <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: Fedora Foundation]
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 15:14:56 -0400
On 4/6/06, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram fedoraproject org> wrote:
> Not necessarily all the best of breed components but what fits into RHEL
> product space. RHEL is open source too. So its Free in that aspect
RHEL is not open source in that I can download and use it without
paying a support fee for it. Piggy-back support clauses are standard
with regard to "the software is free however you may only use it so
long as your support contract is paid up." Not a bad thing; even
RedHat has to feed itself (in a corporate sort of way.)
That is where open source product lines differ: commercially
"available" open source and "truly" open source.
If I am mistaken, regarding either above, please enlighten me.
--
WC (Bill) Jones -- http://youve-reached-the.endoftheinternet.org/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]