yum update blocked for now
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Tue Aug 8 14:57:09 UTC 2006
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 10:55, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
> Actually, in this particular case (evolution etc.), I think it was
> actually updates-testing ... and this is the second time fairly
> recently that broken dependencies have made it in there. Better
> updates-testing than updates-released, though, I guess?
Yes. This was a failure both on my part and the developer. I was too lazy to
click the 'check broken deps' button like I did earlier in the day.
The same problem hit rawhide which is why I made the comments I did.
The developer is working very hard to get the rest of the updates in place
for -testing to solve the broken deps.
--
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060808/847d56d9/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list