Re: question about (this) maillist(s)

[Bruno Wolff III <bruno wolff to>]

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 17:25:26 +0000,
  Ronald Warsow <rwarsow gmx de> wrote:
> 
> one part is left: 
> why is the time stamp sometimes, i would like to say, "normalized" to
> GMT 0000 and sometimes not ?

I thought someone suggested a plausible answer to that. Messages dated in
the future have their date headers replaced. If you system's clock is
a bit ahead of the mailman server's, then depending on how long it takes
to transfer your message to the mailman server you may or may not have the
date header replaced.