[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: renaming /dev/hda to ./dev/sda
- From: Per Bothner <per bothner com>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: renaming /dev/hda to ./dev/sda
- Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 12:32:51 -0800
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Well, "we" I suppose is the kernel folks; this isn't exactly a Fedora
decision and it isn't really new.
It's new for users - people who don't build their own kernels (assuming
they're using PATA disks).
libata uses at least the upper layers of the SCSI subsystem, so the
drives show up as SCSI devices: "sd". Not much different from the USB
storage system.
Of course naming it sd because it "uses at least the upper layers of the
SCSI subsystem" is something that could only make sense to a kernel
hacker ...
I guess you could think of "sd" an acronym for
Storage Device or something.
I think that is actually a reasonable name. Can we make it official?
--
--Per Bothner
per bothner com http://per.bothner.com/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]