[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rawhide report: 20061219 changes
- From: Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20061219 changes
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:53:13 -0500
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:53:04PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> That may not be the case. Then you're asking the installer team to track many
> more releases than they aught to. Using updates.img is a far easier/simple
> way of fixing installer bugs, rather than trying to stabilize the installer
> across new package sets as updates are made. I'd much rather have them
> spending their time making improvements for the next Fedora release.
I think the "fix" here is for people making package upgrades within a released
Fedora version to consider whether the updates might break installation.
--
Matthew Miller mattdm mattdm org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]