[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rawhide report: 20061219 changes
- From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno wolff to>
- To: Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com>
- Cc: fedora-test-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20061219 changes
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:30:31 -0600
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 11:41:52 -0500,
Jesse Keating <jkeating redhat com> wrote:
>
> Respin attempts can happen, but when the new package set + anaconda fails,
> who's going to do the work to fix things?
Well it looks like it is going to be the people doing the respins. I have
tried some of this and even reported some bugs I found while testing things.
I have also learned that if you use the versions of anaconda and its
dependencies that were originally delivered for FC6, respinning DVDs seems
to work. I didn't get CD version to work quite right, but I did get it
working well enough, that I could use the first CD to do an http install
on a machine that couldn't read DVD+RWs.
Considering that I only run Fedora on 3 machines, I spent a lot more time
doing respin attempts for FC6 than was worth it from a testing perspective.
But I did it primarily as a learning experience. However, if I end up with
time to do some FC7 testing when it gets close to release, this will still
be useful, as I can test installing with the updated packages after say,
FC7test3 has been built.
On sort of a related note, is the Pungi project going to just support doing
respins on the original package set, rather than being able to support respins
using updated packages?
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]