pup and pirut exiting behavior?

Don Springall don_springall at hotmail.com
Sat Jan 14 22:02:50 UTC 2006


>From: Jeremy Katz <katzj at redhat.com>
>Reply-To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases 
><fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
>To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases 
><fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: pup and pirut exiting behavior?
>Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:39:16 -0500
>
>On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 01:14 -0500, Jim Cornette wrote:
> > I was testing out pup which a correction was made to accomidate security
> > content. My curiousity is regarding how these programs are supposed to
> > finish up the updates and the duties the programs are designed to
> > handle. both programs finish with no indication that they completed
> > successfully. They do not show an aftermath of rpm errors. The queries
> > on databases shows the package is intact, installed and with no missing
> > components.
>
>It's something I've been back and forth about.  Having someone ask is
>enough to convince me to add the simple "software update successful"
>dialog for the success case.  Will show up in pirut-0.9.4-1 (now
>building).  Also, note that given the impressive amount of code
>duplication, both the pup and pirut frontend are now in the pirut
>package.
>
>Jeremy
I think maybe down the road it would be good to add messages from yum as 
well for some errors. For example if yum.conf gets created as 
yum.conf.rpmnew  it would be a good idea to tell the user about it.
The rest of the scripting errors maybe they could do without but some errors 
are essential to know about.





More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list