Faster network?

Uno Engborg uno at webworks.se
Sun Mar 5 08:26:37 UTC 2006


Jeff Vian wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 10:34 +0100, shrek-m at gmx.de wrote:
>   
>> On 03.03.2006 09:12, Mike Chambers wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_default
>>> echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max
>>> echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default
>>> echo 256960 >> /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_max
>>> echo 0 >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_timestamps
>>> echo 1 >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_sack
>>> echo 1 >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling
>>>
>>>       
>> why  ">>"   ?
>> imho this should be  ">"
>>
>>
>>     
> For me it works with either syntax, but AFAIK the > is the best (and
> most universal) choice
 > is not more universal than >>. The difference is that >> appends to 
an existing file
while > starts writing the file from the beginning. So if the file you 
are >:ing to contains
lines you want to keep they will be gone if you do >.

Regards
Uno Engborg
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3271 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20060305/4a303bc2/attachment.bin>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list