[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
yum cannot deal with "multilib" updates again - sigh!
- From: Michal Jaegermann <michal harddata com>
- To: fedora-test-list redhat com
- Subject: yum cannot deal with "multilib" updates again - sigh!
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 12:25:13 -0600
With rawhide eventually "unplugged" an attempt to run 'yum update'
resulted in the following:
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for gucharmap
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper >= 0.3.11 for gnome-user-docs
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper >= 0.1.4 for gnome-media
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for gnumeric
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for gconf-editor
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper >= 0.3.4 for gnucash-docs
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for gthumb
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for fast-user-switch-applet
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for ggv
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for gnome-utils
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for yelp
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for totem
Error: Unresolveable requirement /usr/bin/scrollkeeper-update for gtkam
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for gdm
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for gtk-doc
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for gnome-terminal
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for libgnomedb-devel
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for eog
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for rhythmbox
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper >= 0.1.4 for printman
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for gnome-pilot
Error: Unresolveable requirement scrollkeeper for libgnomedb
and an update clearly bailed out leaving no further clues what
may be the problem; especially that scrollkeeper-0.3.14-11.fc7,
not that surprisingly, is present on the system.
Only further detective work revealed that the above is a result
of a yum attempt to replace scrollkeeper.x86_64 with rarian.i386
(although rarian.86_64 is also mentioned in a transaction too and
rarian.i386 is definitely not wanted). Excluding 'rarian' allowed
to proceed and I can deal with that issue later.
I believe that this is one more example of a well known bogosity
but if another bugzilla report is desired I can add one.
Michal
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]