libpurple

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Dec 14 22:53:30 UTC 2007


On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:46:58 -0800 (PST)
Antonio Olivares <olivares14031 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> When
>  doing a yum update -y from 
> # 
> 
> I get the following about libpurple along with the failed updates for
> KDE.
> 
> Error: Missing Dependency: libsilcclient-1.0.so.1 is needed by
> package libpurple Error: Missing Dependency: libsilc-1.0.so.2 is
> needed by package libpurple
> 
> What is libpurple?  by doing a
> # yum update -y --exclude=libpurple
> 
> still the message appears.  Is libpurple very important here that
> excluding it from updating, still it complains about it.

The problem would be that libpurple isn't being updated, but libsilc is
being updated.  The installed libpurple needs what is provided by the
libsilc that would be replaced with a new libsilc.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20071214/75b9aca6/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list