Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Build System wrote:
....
Does the message indicate they are now available in the repo ? Perhaps they should have the standard headers like existing packages - ie when who and the initial version.New package php-pear-HTML-QuickForm-ElementGrid Meta-element which holds any other element in a gridPlease fix these reports to have a date in the subject.
I also noticed some oddities in other entries: ! missing blank line: aircrack-ng-0.9-1.fc7 --------------------- * Mon May 14 2007 Till Maas <opensource till name> - 0.9-1 - update to latest version anaconda-11.2.0.59-1 -------------------- ! missing comment for perl-File-Next: * Mon May 14 2007 Ralf Corsépius <rc040203 freenet de> - 0.33-1 - Upstream update. perl-File-Next-0.40-1.fc7 ------------------------- perl-Module-Refresh-0.13-1.fc7 ------------------------------ and: - Upstream sync php-pear-MDB2-Driver-mysql-1.4.1-1.fc7 -------------------------------------- php-pear-Net-Socket-1.0.8-1.fc7 ------------------------------- * Tue May 08 2007 Remi Collet <Fedora FamilleCollet com> 1.0.8-1 etc. =====I would suggest that build system should not be allowed to make an updated package available without at least mention of the person who instigated it, and their comment {better - minimum 5 words}.
Reasoning - even in summary form - now that many people can do lots, it is more important that changes are notarized / traced.
DaveT.ps: I see lots of package updates from non-redhat staff :-) This merge thing is really in action !!!