rawhide report: 20071102 changes

[shrek-m at gmx.de]

seth vidal schrieb:
> On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 14:52 +0100, shrek-m at gmx.de wrote:
>   
>> but i can not follow the downgrade logic. is  EPOCH  the mystery?
>> 8.0.2-1.fc8  <  1:0.17.7-3.fc8
>> is  0:8.0  <  1:0.17   ?
>>     
> yes.
>
> a package w/o an epoch or with a zero epoch is less than a package with
> an epoch of a greater value.
>
> the above is exactly what epochs are for.

thanks  rahul and seth  for the explanation.

-- 
shrek-m