[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: network problems after installation
- From: "Andrew Cannon" <andrew artcannon ukfsn org>
- To: fedora-test-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: network problems after installation
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:20:46 +0100
Hi All,
I too have had numerous problems with Networking. My setup is a simple
home network with a router connecting me to the internet via eth0. Now,
my problem is that the network is not getting activated on boot (despite
me having ifcfg-eth0 set to start the interface at boot. I've used
NetworkManager (which I detest) and that didn't work (it overwrote the
DNS entries so I could not communicate with the rest of the world) I've
set everything to be static, I've tried DHCP and I still can't get the
network to initialize until I manually bring the network up with
/sbin/ifup eth0.
The only output I get from dmesg is:
[acannon Cannon5 ~]$ dmesg | grep network
[acannon Cannon5 ~]$ dmesg | grep eth0
eth0: RTL8168b/8111b at 0xffffc20000c36000, 00:1a:4d:5a:04:6d, XID
38000000 IRQ2297
r8169: eth0: link up
r8169: eth0: link up
eth0: no IPv6 routers present
[acannon Cannon5 ~]$ dmesg | grep r8169
r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK-NAPI loaded
r8169: eth0: link up
r8169: eth0: link up
So dmesg thinks that the connection is up, but the rest of the system
doesn't. Network manager reports the following, even though I haven't
got the connection controlled by NM:
Apr 18 23:06:34 Cannon5 nm-system-settings: ifcfg-fedora: Ignoring
connection 'ifcfg-eth0' and its device because NM_CONTROLLED was false.
Anyone got any ideas on this? I've got everything set as static in
ifcfg-eth0 and my resolv.conf has been edited with the DNS entries, plus
I've got them in my hosts file too.
TIA
Andy
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]