Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Guys any reason why he cant use 3.2.20-4.fc10 build instead of 3.2.20-4.fc9 since he's on a F10 system?Seth Vidal wrote:Please install the 3.2.20-4.fc9 from updates-testing, if it fails then make a bugzilla report and attach the outputOn Mon, 1 Dec 2008, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:File a bug against yum see what Seth has to say.. Came across this in F9 cycle I think., You might need to "help" yum a bit.. yum -y update --skip-broken -x packageStart with the first then continue adding -x package until you hit the one(s) causing this..Then mentioned the package(s) that causes this on your bug report.Actually, Tim does most of the skip-broken spelunking. Credit where it is due.Also before filing a bug - get yum 3.2.20-4.fc9 from updates-testing and try it there. It might still fail but the debugging from that version should be better.Thanks, -svfrom 'yum -d7 --skip-broken update' Tim
Any differences between these builds? JBG
begin:vcard fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson n:Gudmundsson;Johann B. org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management adr:Taeknigardi;;Dunhagi 5;Reykjavik;;107;Iceland email;internet:johannbg hi is title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA tel;work:+3545254267 tel;fax:+3545528801 tel;pager:N/A tel;home:N/A tel;cell:N/A url:www.rhi.hi.is version:2.1 end:vcard