Re: Shtt!!

[Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>]

On Dec 2, 2008, at 7:44 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 05:22:18PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > I'm not 100% buying into it either -- otherwise, I would have  
> > worked on
> > actually pushing it more.  But it does seem to come up with some  
> > level
> > of frequency, and unlike some of the things in that bucket, I can
> > actually see some of the cases where it's useful
>
> It could possibly be useful and simplify things for those who set
> that up but then anaconda would have to have some automatic
> preference for such local repo.  It already does?

We don't -- but if yum grew the support, then we'd almost certainly  
prefer following it.

Jeremy