[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Today's F8 kernel update fails!
- From: Andrew Farris <lordmorgul gmail com>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Today's F8 kernel update fails!
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:14:21 -0800
Neal Becker wrote:
nash received SIGSEGV! Backtrace (12):
/sbin/nash[0x40c7c9]
/lib64/libc.so.6[0x3834c30f30]
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x36bf028a89]
/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0[0x36bf028e21]
/usr/lib64/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_module_unload_all+0x24)[0x3e1dc02411]
/usr/lib64/libbdevid.so.6.0.19(bdevid_destroy+0x29)[0x3e1dc01bef]
/usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19[0x3e1e415fe2]
/usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19(nash_vitals_destroy_probes+0x3a)[0x3e1e416661]
/usr/lib64/libnash.so.6.0.19(_nashFreeContext+0x16)[0x3e1e406ef4]
/sbin/nash[0x40ccd0]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf4)[0x3834c1e074]
/sbin/nash[0x404179]
Which kernel was this? (what today are we talking about?) This occurred during
the install or booting?
kernel-2.6.23.14-115? what arch? That kernel pushed to updates-testing 1/24.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul gmail com> <ajfarris gmail com>
gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]