[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Kernel Oops: kerneloops enough? BZ too?
- From: Dave Jones <davej redhat com>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Kernel Oops: kerneloops enough? BZ too?
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:33:45 -0400
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:53:03AM -0700, Tom London wrote:
> A question about fedora BZ preference.....
>
> I just installed kerneloops.
>
> To date, whenever I've seen kernel Oops, BUGs, INFOs, etc., I've filed
> fedora BZ's for them against the kernel/rawhide.
>
> Is that still the 'preferred method', or should I assume kerneloops is enough?
Bugzilla is still preferred.
Letting kerneloops file a report is also useful just for statistical purposes.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]