GDM works again, for me anyway. Is SELinux busted?

Alan alan at clueserver.org
Wed Mar 12 21:31:00 UTC 2008


> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> No upstart/rhgb busted the system, and SELinux had to add rules to allow
>> the change.
>>
>> It is all about perspective.  :^)
>
> OK, upstart/rhgb needed rules to play nicely. :-)
>
>>
>> It should be fixed now.
>
> I'm pulling in the new policy now. Currently I booted with enforcing=0
> during boot to get into the system.
>
> It happened in runlevel 1 also. I did have rhgb on the boot line since
> it usually is enough to just append the runlevel without deleting rhgb
> from the line.

What is weird is that the 2.6.24 kernel works for me, but the 2.6.25
kernel throws a bunch of selinux errors.

I have had to turn off enforcing just to make things work.  We will see if
it does any good.




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list