[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
X.org server 1.5: An ABI Too Far?
- From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R <caf omen com>
- To: Fedora Test List <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: X.org server 1.5: An ABI Too Far?
- Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:09:07 -0700
Should Rawhide switch back to a supported version of X.org,
or at least make it an option? Much of what makes a desktop
contemporary depends on features in the Nvidia driver not
presented in the nv driver.
I Googled around and didn't find any explanation of what
fantastic wonders await us with the new ABI. I did get the
impression the new X.org ABI isn't even settled yet, let alone
finished and implemented.
If that is true, perhaps Fedora should stick with a working
version of X until the support for the New X is there. Or at
least provide a working (e.g., Compiz et al.) X as a choice.
--
Chuck Forsberg caf omen com www.omen.com 503-614-0430
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 FAX 629-0665
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]