[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Is tgere an "updates" log anywhere ?
- From: "Arne Chr. Jorgensen" <achrisjo yahoo com>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Is tgere an "updates" log anywhere ?
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Well, I did write some inputs in a previous post ( see link to ) later.
Here I include a very short example from a rawhide report:
bolzplatz2006-1.0.3-5.fc9
-------------------------
* Fri Mar 14 2008 Hans de Goede <j w r degoede hhs nl> 1.0.3-5
- Adapt launch script and (Build)Requires for icedtea -> openjdk rename
- Drop ExclusiveArch now that openjdk also is available for ppc
It does at least tell something about changes ( not much, but..) you may get some understanding of their intentions. I wondered if there was a more descriptive note, regarding "updates" we receive ?
When something works, and you get an
updated package - I would like to know a bit about what they attempt to do, like the later kernel.
//ARNE
Link to:
(not sure if this made a link or not, ....)
//ARNE
Jon Stanley <jonstanley gmail com>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008
at 12:10 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> There are similar reports generated for the updates-testing repos for
> the released versions of the distribution (subject: Fedora X
> updates-testing report).
There is also the mailing list
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-announce that
receives announcements of stable updates.
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list redhat com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]