On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 17:21 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:32:27 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 13:08 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > What is it about the nemiver-devel.i386 that absolutely requires > > > > nemiver.i386 instead of nemiver.x86_64? > > > > > > The ability to link against 32-bit libs. > > > > That means it should require those 32-bit libs. Ideally this requires > > would happen automatically, through the use of a .so symlink to a > > versioned arch specific shared object. However I gather that this isn't > > necessarily C so there is no symlink. I hate that we would have to add > > yet another file requires here. > > It is C/C++, and there is no .so symlink because the library uses > a version-less SONAME and therefore uses a .so file name already. Got any clever thoughts on how to resolve this, without adding manual file deps? -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part