On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 20:30 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Clever? Add a version to the soname after talking to upstream about it. > If they think the library interface is not stable enough, they can still > use .so.0 instead of just .so > Alternatively, ship a dummy executable in the -devel package, which causes > rpmbuild to create an automatic soname dep. ;) Heh, ok, both of those went through my mind too, glad we're on the same page. Peter Gordon, can you take this issue to upstream? We really would rather not see unversioned shared objects. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part