Some things to focus testing on for F9Beta

[Rahul Sundaram]

John Summerfield wrote:
> 
> Richard mentioned a specific example where the package didn't seem to 
> have had even a rudimentary test, and I thought you were defending the 
> packager.

Then you thought wrong. I was explaining the general scenario. Not a 
specific instance. The specific instance doesn't fail any rudimentary 
test anyway IMO. It installs, removes and updates packages just fine. 
Sure, there are UI bugs and I have been filing them one by one. 
Remember, we are talking about rawhide, the development version of Fedora.

>> Of course there are many. One example would be
>>
>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-March/msg00010.html 
> 
> 
> That's _after_ it's released to users. Richard's example was one that 
> should not have gone that far.

Packages in the development, updates-testing repository can be tested 
and feedback provided which determines whether it goes released or not 
to general users.

Rahul