superuser console?

[David Boles]

John Summerfield wrote:
> Alain PORTAL wrote:
>> Le jeudi 01 mai 2008, Rex Dieter a �crit :
>>> Alain PORTAL wrote:
>>>> Is it a KDE or a Fedora non-feature?
>>> KDE (ie, we haven't done anything to affect this anyway).
>>
>> OK.
>>
>> And nobody complaint about that????
>>
>> Every body is happy with that behaviour?
> 
> I've been using KDE since 1.x or so. On f9 I use Gnome.
> 
>>
>> Nobody needs dayly a console with fully superuser permissions when he 
>> works as a normal user?
> 
> I set up and use sudo, so the lack of root console wouldn't affect me, 
> even if I continued using KDE.
> 
>>
>> As an example, every time I need to know a status service, I need to 
>> "/sbin/service" instead of "service"?
> 
> Configure $PATH in .bashrc or .bash_profile
>>
>> For me, this really a regression about a Linux Distribution can offer me.
>>
>> Should I have to build my Linux from scratch to get an old behaviour?
> 
> Be our guest:-)
> 
> Might be easier to switch to Debian, Ubuntu or OpenSUSE. If you want to 
> build your own, try gentoo.

8-)

I have always loved that threat. 'If you don't do what I want I will leave for 
a different distro!!' I will no longer accept what you provide me for free!! I 
will go elsewhere!! And accept what they provide for free!!'

When you think about it, really think about it, it rings kinda' like an empty 
threat does it not?  ;-)
-- 


   David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20080501/20595314/attachment.sig>