monodevelop 1.0
Paul
paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk
Tue May 6 12:49:14 UTC 2008
Hi,
> 2008/4/26 Dejan Čabrilo <dcabrilo at gmail.com>:
> Hello all,
>
> As I lost all hope that monodevelop 1.0 will make it into F9,
> I wanted
> to check out if anyone gave a shot at packaging monodevelop
> 1.0. I
> know there are some significant differences in terms of
> dependencies
> compared to the version in rawhide, so I just wanted to see if
> anyone
> would share their experiences before I give it a go.
>
> Also, when can we expect it in rawhide?
>
> I have a MonoDevelop 1.0 package, it was a simple version bump. Once
> the maintainer gets around to it I am sure Fedora will get 1.0 issued
> as an update. I'll shot the good Paul Johnson a mail request said
> update.
Monodevelop for F9 will require a few additional packages making their
way into F9 before I can update it. Currently though, I'm having fun
trying to get the texteditor in it to work!
TTFN
Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20080506/633c4f52/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list