Latest NM and S-C-N

[Gilboa Davara]

On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 12:32 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:53 -0500, David G. Mackay wrote:
> >> I just installed the latest NetworkManager.  It came up at boot, which
> >> is good.
> >>
> >> Just for fun, I deleted eth0 in sys-config-network, then re-added it.
> >> It did not set the managed by NetworkManager flag, and it did not set up
> >> DNS.  Are the fixes for S-C-N due soon?
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > I think I'm hitting the same problem. [1]
> > S-C-N and NM doesn't seem to be in sync with each other - though it
> > seems that adding DNS1/2 by hand solved the problem.
> > 
> > - Gilboa
> > [1] 
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=134886
> > 
> > 
> 
> yes, changing s-c-n to use DNS[1-3] was too much change just after freeze.
> s-c-n still uses change_resolv_conf() from /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/network-functions to update 
> resolve.conf.
> 

Question is - how does it affects upgrades?
Their old S-C-N-generated configuration will be using resolv.conf -
which will be trashed by NM.

I'd add a note about it in the F9's release notes.

- Gilboa