Fedora 9 updates-testing report

[Greg]

Adrin Jalali wrote:
>
> Although I'm proud of using fedora as it is Bleeding Edge of software, 
> but I think the unstable part of project should be tested by 
> fedora-testers, not end users, they(end users) must always feel 
> stable, don't you think so?
> As far as fedora use pre-release versions of softwares, it means that 
> fedora developers are so courage that they use the Bleeding Edge of 
> software, it's so good and appreciated. But I think what reaches the 
> end users, must be the last stable versions of softwares, not unstable 
> pre-release ones. As a result, I can not see any movie in my fedora 9 
> release yet. Do you think it's normal? As another illustration I think 
> fedora must let users chose their X server. I have an ATI Mobility 
> Radeon and as the driver is not prepared completely yet, I can not use 
> the 3D acceleration capabilities of my graphic card.
>
>
>     why is it unstable? it was shipped with Pre-Release of Xorg7.4 an
>     1.5 so its not like the Fedora users werent warned. plus when you
>     use fedora your using Bleeding Edge software, you have to expect
>     some things to be unstable at first, its like a Brand New car,
>     when you buy one, even that has its problems until you get it fixed
>
>
>
>
>
Not Possible for Fedora-Testers. but us End users of fedora Are the 
Fedora-testers you could say, as i said your whinging about bleeding 
edge an its unstability, simple thing dont use it, go over to some other 
Distro thats " Stable " 

-- 
Regards Greg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: spowd.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 147 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20080518/154922b2/attachment.vcf>