firefox after updates, asks for license agreement then bails out

Benjamin Lewis ben.lewis at benl.co.uk
Tue May 20 21:16:28 UTC 2008


On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:03:23 Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 18:26 +0100, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
> > Is it _really_ necessary to pester the user with this? No other piece
> > of MPL
> > licensed software does.
>
> No, it's not.  This is considered a bug IIRC.

That's good then.

Out of curiosity, is there a documented policy on this?

-- 

Benjamin Lewis
Fedora Ambassador
ben.lewis at benl.co.uk

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://benl.co.uk./                                 PGP Key: 0x647E480C

"In cases of major discrepancy, it is always reality that got it wrong"
                                                        -- RFC 1118
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20080520/3b3f9567/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list