firefox after updates, asks for license agreement then bails out
Benjamin Lewis
ben.lewis at benl.co.uk
Tue May 20 21:16:28 UTC 2008
On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:03:23 Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 18:26 +0100, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
> > Is it _really_ necessary to pester the user with this? No other piece
> > of MPL
> > licensed software does.
>
> No, it's not. This is considered a bug IIRC.
That's good then.
Out of curiosity, is there a documented policy on this?
--
Benjamin Lewis
Fedora Ambassador
ben.lewis at benl.co.uk
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://benl.co.uk./ PGP Key: 0x647E480C
"In cases of major discrepancy, it is always reality that got it wrong"
-- RFC 1118
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20080520/3b3f9567/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list