Re: ath5k module vs. MadWifi

["Partha Bagchi" <partha1b gmail com>]

On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Scott Robbins <scottro nyc rr com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 11:12:35AM -0500, Jason Farrell wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 12:34 AM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa gmail com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only real downside of the current ath5k is that the wifi status LEDs no
>> longer work, but that's a small price to pay for everything working after
>> suspend/resume, and for not needing the madwifi kmod.
>
> If you use MadWifi and the 2.6.27 kernel, are you able to get the LED
> working?  I thought that was kernel specific as the sysctl options don't
> seem to be there (the ledpins and softled.)
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Scott Robbins
> PGP keyID EB3467D6
> ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
>
> Angelus: No weapons... no friends... no hope. Take all
> that away and what's left?
> Buffy: Me.
>
> --
> fedora-test-list mailing list
> fedora-test-list redhat com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
>

Does anyone know why the softled options were removed from 2.6.27?

Thanks,
Partha