Kernel failure

Antonio Olivares olivares14031 at yahoo.com
Thu Nov 13 23:53:11 UTC 2008


--- On Thu, 11/13/08, Timothy Murphy <gayleard at eircom.net> wrote:

> From: Timothy Murphy <gayleard at eircom.net>
> Subject: Re: Kernel failure
> To: "Kyle McMartin" <kyle at infradead.org>
> Cc: fedora-kernel-list at redhat.com, "For testers of Fedora Core development releases" <fedora-test-list at redhat.com>
> Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008, 3:45 PM
> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 23:14:32 Kyle McMartin wrote:
> 
> > > Is everyone getting a "Kernel failure"
> message
> > > with the latest kernel, 2.6.27.4-79.fc10.i686 ?
> 
> > It would be helpful if you could attach a bit more of
> the context around
> > this. There should be a bit of spew with it that would
> help us debug it.
> 
> I'm still getting the same message with
> kernel-2.6.27.5-94.fc10.i686 .
> The full backtrace reads:
> 
> Kernel failure message 1:
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:463 sysfs_add_one+0x2a/0x36()
> sysfs: duplicate filename '1' can not be created
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.27.5-94.fc10.i686 #1
> [<c042bb3a>] warn_slowpath+0x4b/0x6c
> [<c051cd00>] ? vsnprintf+0x333/0x54e
> [<c04026bf>] ? __switch_to+0xb9/0x139
> [<c0518635>] ? idr_get_empty_slot+0x12a/0x1d9
> [<c05187b4>] ? ida_get_new_above+0xd0/0x171
> [<c04cbf58>] ? sysfs_ilookup_test+0x0/0x11
> [<c04a08e3>] ? ifind+0x55/0x60
> [<c04cc14b>] ? sysfs_find_dirent+0x16/0x27
> [<c04cc29d>] sysfs_add_one+0x2a/0x36
> [<c04cc73a>] create_dir+0x43/0x68
> [<c04cc78c>] sysfs_create_dir+0x2d/0x41
> [<c051912c>] kobject_add_internal+0xb2/0x153
> [<c0519278>] kobject_add_varg+0x35/0x41
> [<c05192a4>] kobject_init_and_add+0x20/0x22
> [<c05270ee>] pci_create_slot+0x93/0xe1
> [<c056228c>] register_slot+0x14f/0x1e7
> [<c044042c>] ? up+0x2b/0x2f
> [<c05538ce>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x9a/0x110
> [<c05521b1>] acpi_walk_namespace+0x46/0x66
> [<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
> [<c056210c>] walk_p2p_bridge+0xb7/0xe8
> [<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
> [<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
> [<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
> [<c05538ce>] acpi_ns_walk_namespace+0x9a/0x110
> [<c05521b1>] acpi_walk_namespace+0x46/0x66
> [<c0562055>] ? walk_p2p_bridge+0x0/0xe8
> [<c0562008>] acpi_pci_slot_add+0x10d/0x15a
> [<c0562055>] ? walk_p2p_bridge+0x0/0xe8
> [<c056213d>] ? register_slot+0x0/0x1e7
> [<c0560809>] acpi_pci_register_driver+0x39/0x50
> [<c08356b4>] acpi_pci_slot_init+0x17/0x1b
> [<c0401125>] _stext+0x3d/0x115
> [<c083569d>] ? acpi_pci_slot_init+0x0/0x1b
> [<c0464a58>] ? register_irq_proc+0x92/0xae
> [<c0464ab1>] ? init_irq_proc+0x3d/0x4a
> [<c0814362>] kernel_init+0x177/0x1c5
> [<c08141eb>] ? kernel_init+0x0/0x1c5
> [<c04048f7>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> =======================
> ---[ end trace a7919e7f17c0a725 ]---
> 
> 
> -- 

Have you tried with newer kernel 

[root at riohigh2 ~]# uname -a
Linux riohigh2 2.6.27.5-101.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Wed Nov 12 00:50:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux
?

Regards,

Antonio 


      




More information about the fedora-test-list mailing list