EPEL or Fedora product?

[Dennis Gilmore]

On Saturday 18 October 2008 10:06:24 pm John Poelstra wrote:
> Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams said the following on 10/18/2008 07:41 PM Pacific
>
> Time:
> > On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 19:38 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >> Working on some bug triage... should bugs like this be open against
> >> "Fedora EPEL" instead of "Fedora" since it is a "do this for EPEL" type
> >> bug... not Fedora?
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454918
> >
> > It's not *against* EPEL, so I'm inclined to say no.
>
> I read the bug as "please build these packages in EPEL"... so why
> wouldn't that be an EPEL bug?
it would only not be an EPEL bug if it doesnt exist in EPEL currently.  if its 
not in EPEL there is no Feodra EPEL component in bugzilla.  and so you can 
only use fedora.  otherwise its an epel bug and should be there.

Dennis

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20081018/0bb15b8d/attachment.sig>