Re: unintentional result of anaconda storage rewrite?

[Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>]

On Sunday, April 12 2009, Tom Horsley said:
> In all previous fedora versions I remember, any ext3 disk
> partitions I formatted during the install had the various
> tune2fs parameters set so fsck would never do any kind
> of automatic check.
> 
> Now I notice my fedora 11 beta partition (formatted when
> I installed from the beta dvd) is telling me it will be
> automatically checked in 4 more reboots.
> 
> So, is this a bug I should report, or was a decision made
> to make anaconda more compatible with the defaults you
> get when you run mkfs (which I've found normally does
> schedule automatic checks)?

Bug, please report

Jeremy