[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: palimpsest vs. smartctl
- From: Matthias Clasen <mclasen redhat com>
- To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: palimpsest vs. smartctl
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:15:11 -0400
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 10:22 +0200, Jiri Cerny wrote:
> Since yesterdays rawhide update, I am getting the 'One or more disks
> are failing' icon in the notification area.
>
> When I click on it, the palimpsest utility starts. It says that the
> disk has bad sectors. When I click on details, I get
> Ata Smart Attributes window, which claims that 'Reallocated Sector
> Count' and 'Reallocation Count' fail.
>
> I do not understand the data in the table very well, but what I found
> surprising that the Value of Reallocated Sector Count is 0, what does
> not seems to me like value which should fail.
>
> I tried to check this with smartctl -a /dev/sda, I get the output
> that can be seen below and which looks quite without problem. Also
> smartctl -l error, smartctl -l selftest report no errors.
>
> My question is: Is my disk really failing or is there some bug in the
> reporting software?
Hey,
if you think the disk is fine, but palimpsest is still showing you the
bubble, can you please file a bug and attach your data there ? It is
possible that the code in palimpsest / libatasmart needs some tweaks to
avoid false positives.
Thanks
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]