[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: palimpsest vs. smartctl



On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 18:30 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:

> In my case palimpsest reports a failing disk error because the worst
> value of a temperature attribute is one lower than the threshold. The
> current value is well above the threshold. Perhaps palimpsest should
> support manually ignoring a failed attribute so the warning icon will
> show up only if another attribute will give failure?

Maybe...again, such suggestions are best sent to bugzilla. David is not
reading this list.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]