F12 Alpha test compose test status

[John Poelstra]

James Laska said the following on 08/05/2009 02:26 PM Pacific Time:
> Greetings,
> 
> You may have seen Liam's request for install test assistance with the
> recent F12-Alpha test compose [1].  Thank you for pitching in!  Test
> results have helped provide data to assess the health of F-12-Alpha.
> 
> Given that today (2009-08-05) is the scheduled date to compose a
> F12-Alpha candidate compose, a summary of current efforts against the
> test compose is in order.
> 
> Test execution progress to date:
>       * All tier#1 tests have been executed, excluding:
>               * Live media installs
>               * All ppc tests (currently blocked, see #515555 below)
>       * A mix of remaining tier#2 and tier#3 tests executed
> 
> So far, testing has resulted in the following additions to the F12Alpha
> blocker bug [2]:
> 
>       * 499854 - NEW - filedescriptor out of range in select()   
>       * 513879 - ASSIGNED - Rawhide anaconda not using correct gtk
>         theme 
>       * 515091 - MODIFIED - rescue mode fails: not all arguments
>         converted; open("/etc/mtab", ... 
>       * 515472 - MODIFIED - f12 alpha system can not reboot 
>       * 515555 - NEW - F-12-Alpha-TC - There was an error installing the
>         bootloader. 
>       * 515564 - NEW - Physical media installs fail -
>         storage.errors.FSError: mountpoint does not exist 
>       * 515585 - NEW - CD Install fails to eject cdrom - WARNING: error
>         ejecting cdrom sr0: (5, 'Input/output error') 
>       * 515695 - MODIFIED - FAIL - installer image sanity test -
>         missing .treeinfo and images 
> 
> Testing continues as does defect analysis.  However, with the
> information available, the above issues were deemed important enough to
> warrant review as F12Alpha blockers.
> 
> [1]
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-August/msg00063.html
> [2]
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=507676&hide_resolved=1
> 
> Thanks,
> James
> 

This may potentially be a bug against the paravirt install test for 
Fedora 12.  Not sure whether it is a Fedora 12 (guest) or RHEL (dom0) 
problem so it was suggested I start by filing it against RHEL.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831

john