[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Announcing Fedora 12 Alpha
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: sundaram fedoraproject org, For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list redhat com>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: Announcing Fedora 12 Alpha
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:08:50 -0400
Rahul Sundaram (sundaram fedoraproject org) said:
> > Except it changes the default for everyone to something with less
> > functionality, which I'm fairly sure we don't want to do after feature
> > freeze. Notably, ssmtp won't queue if you're offline, if I'm reading
> > the docs right.)
>
> If feature freeze is the only consideration preventing it from
> happening, then queue it for Fedora 13. Less functionality is perfectly
> fine unless there is a strong case that more of those features is
> actually being used by a majority in order to satisfy the nominal
> requirements of being a default package.
The entire reason that a MTA is dragged into the core group is for
things like cron. In the base group, at (and up until recently, logwatch.)
If you replace that with ssmtp, *out of the box all that mail is
dropped on the floor*. I don't think that's a reasonable position
to take by default.
(There are solutions here, of course - asking for an e-mail address for
each user, and asking which user is the admin. But we don't do that
now.)
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]