Wiki suggestions

[Leam Hall]

Paul Frields wrote:

> A CMS is good for a document like a general QA guide for users -- i.e.
> something that helps people get started with the team, understand the
> terminology, how to set up a testing environment, and so on.  Those
> details largely won't change between releases so it's easy enough to
> keep the document in sync with reality, especially if you give broad
> editing rights to the QA group so that people can help.

> As long as this model is limited to canonical docs with a very low
> rate of change, this should work OK.

Totally agree! I've nothing against open collaboration until it makes 
information harder to get or impossible to use.

Leam