Re: Release-critical bug process?

[Kevin Kofler <kevin kofler chello at>]

Adam Williamson wrote:
> True, but it's better than a kick in the teeth. Remember we're talking
> about using it as a cue for triagers, not for developers. Even though
> reporters sometimes just have an overinflated sense of the importance of
> their own bug, it's _generally_ not a bad idea for triagers to at least
> take a look at bugs that reporters have categorized highly before
> looking at others.

My experience is that really urgent bugs rarely get marked urgent, at least
by the reporter, unimportant crap gets marked urgent way more easily.

        Kevin Kofler