Submitting a bug report on ping6 and traceroute6?
Robert Moskowitz
rgm at htt-consult.com
Fri Feb 20 15:10:30 UTC 2009
Oleg Ponomarev wrote:
> Hi! On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> I wrote about this bug with subject "only IPv6 nameservers in
> resolv.conf", it is still in glibc-2.9-3.i686
And Oleg told me the work around is adding
nameserver 127.0.0.1
to your /etc/resolv.conf
yuck!
>
>> I believe I have hit a bug on FC10 with ping6 and traceroute6. My
>> colleague at my ISP has 'see things like this with glibc in the past'.
>>
>> I am running a system with ONLY IPv6 on eth0 (of course there is IPv4
>> on l0, you can't turn that off). The system has a global IPv6 address
>> from my RADVD server and can ping6 out when supplied IPv6 addresses.
>> In /etc/resolv.conf I have the IPv6 address of my providers DNS
>> server, ns1.clearrate.com (I first started with my own caching
>> server, but switched to his to limit the problem tracing).
>>
>> The host program works. If I try 'host www.clearrate.com', I get back
>> its IPv4 and IPv6 address. But when I try 'ping6 -n
>> www.clearrate.com', I get host unknown. traceroute6 fails as does
>> Firefox (but all work when provided the IPv6 address directly).
>>
>> BTW, a Centos 5 system configured the same way, on the same subnet
>> works just fine....
>>
>> So smells like a bug to me.
>
More information about the fedora-test-list
mailing list